adhd-anti:

downwithterf:

ominouslymathematical:

honeygordo:

yelnatszeroni:

stuffulcourse:

aphobegengar:

slavz:

just-a-shidgen:

1-800-exclusionist:

fairyling:

just-a-shidgen:

so we can all agree that people who use the ‘sapphic’ or ‘lesbian’ labels are 99% of the time abusive, toxic, and exclusionary, right? right. thanks for coming to my tedtalk

lesbophobia? in this economy?

@just-a-shidgen explain.

valid, trustworthy: ‘wlw’, ‘i like girls!’, ‘gynephilic’, ‘homosexual/homoromantic’, all ambiphilic labels (bi, pan, polysexual, et cetera)

invalid,
avoid at all costs, probably ready to scream ‘ALL MEN MUST DIE’, most
likely to knife an ace in the back alley for “”stealing resources the
Actually Oppressed™””, more biphobic than the average str8: ‘lesbian’, ‘sapphic’

op i would slay you with my sword u piece of shit homophobic freak

op fucking choke challenge

u know normally i don’t knife people in alleys but i’d make an exception for OP

the correct term is dyke american

valid, trustworthy: a transphobic term that literally means attracted to vaginas that was made in order to exclude trans women

invalid, avoid at all costs: word that simply means woman attracted to women

Funnily enough, OP also ships pedophilia, as if they weren’t enough of a human turd

Valid, trustworthy: 98% of lesbians and sapphics

Invalid, avoid at all costs: the op of this post